Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: June 17, 2018
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pediatric Blunt Pancreatic Injury: A Case Series
Maho Kurashima1, Hannah Wiseman2, Shin Miyata1
1Pediatric Surgery, Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, USA.
Insights
Pediatric pancreatic injuries are rare. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a viable treatment for severe pancreatic injuries in children, with timely intervention crucial for optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
Background:
- Pancreatic injuries in children are uncommon and pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
- Limited evidence-based guidelines exist for managing pediatric pancreatic trauma.
- Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly considered for pediatric surgical conditions.
Abstract:
Pancreatic injuries in pediatric patients are rare and present challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to patient size and limited evidence-based guidelines. This case series highlights the laparoscopic management, decision-making process, and outcomes of three pediatric patients with grade III pancreatic injuries. Case 1 involved a two-year-old male with a near-complete transection of the pancreatic tail following a motor vehicle collision. He underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy 24 hours post-injury, complicated by ileus and mild pancreatitis, which resolved without intervention. Case 2 was another two-year-old male with a complete pancreatic transection from blunt trauma, who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy 36 hours post-injury and was discharged uneventfully. Case 3 was a 12-year-old male with a mid-body pancreatic transection after a handlebar accident, who underwent delayed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy seven days post-injury following failed pancreatic duct stenting. Postoperatively, he developed pancreatic leakage and bowel perforation, requiring additional surgeries, including a colostomy and further pancreatic resection. Laparoscopy was selected in all cases due to hemodynamic stability and enhanced visualization of the pancreatic duct and splenic vessels. In Cases 1 and 2, small patient size precluded endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, prompting early surgical intervention. In Case 3, delayed surgery after failed stenting led to inflammation and significant postoperative complications. This series emphasizes the importance of timely surgical decision-making in pediatric pancreatic injuries. While laparoscopy offers advantages, challenges such as pancreatic duct identification and the risk of conversion to open surgery require careful intraoperative assessment.

