Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Invasive Hemodynamic Characterization of the Portal-hypertensive Syndrome in Cirrhotic Rats
Published on: August 1, 2018
Effect of Regional Anesthesia Techniques on Hemodynamic Variables Measured With FloTrac/Vigileo™ System: A
Sandeep Diwan1, Suhrud Panchawagh2, Parag K Sancheti3
1Anaesthesiology, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, IND.
None:
Background and objectives Neuraxial anesthesia, particularly the subarachnoid block (SAB) or spinal anesthesia, is a viable option utilized for the surgical management of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) in the geriatric population. The hemodynamic effects of SAB could be detrimental in the geriatric population, especially with cardiac comorbidities. A segmental epidural or lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) is particularly safe for this cohort while undergoing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery. We decided to monitor variations in cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) in a cohort of patients who were undergoing proximal femoral nailing for PFFs. The FloTrac/Vigileo™ System was employed to monitor hemodynamic variables continuously. Methods This prospective, observational study included 29 patients with PFFs. Heart rate, CO, SV, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were continuously monitored from the commencement of regional anesthesia (segmental epidural or LSPB) to the conclusion of the surgical procedure. Before regional anesthesia techniques, each patient was administered a mini-fluid challenge. Results Eleven patients were recruited in the epidural group, and 18 patients in the LSPB group. Compared to the epidural group, for each unit increase in SV in the LSPB group, the rate of increase in MAP was higher by 0.13 (p<0.001). Compared to the epidural group, for each unit increase in CO in the LSPB group, the rate of increase in MAP was higher by 2.78 (p<0.001). Compared to the epidural group, for each minute passed under the LSPB group, the rate of increase in CO was lower by 2.18 (p<0.001). Compared to the epidural group, for each minute passed under the LSPB group, the rate of increase in SV was lower by 0.05 (p<0.001). In four patients in whom LSPB was administered, noradrenaline and vasopressors were given, while six patients in the epidural group received inotropes and vasopressors. Conclusions In patients having PFN for PFFs, regional anesthesia in the form of a segmental epidural or lumbosacral plexus provides steady hemodynamics during the perioperative phase. Furthermore, maintaining proper fluid balance can meet a fluid challenge even in high-risk populations.
More Related Videos
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
06:30Quantifying Acute Changes in Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Response to Central Nervous System Manipulations in Anesthetized Rats
Published on: September 11, 2018