Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: April 11, 2019
Efficacy and influencing factors of modified electroconvulsive therapy for schizophrenia: a real-world retrospective
Zhiping Wang1, Jiancheng Qiu1, Ping Zhang1
1Nantong Mental Health Center (The Fourth People's Hospital of Nantong), Nangtong, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a chronic and disabling psychiatric disorder. Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT), which involves electrical stimulation under general anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, is widely used to treat SCZ. Despite its rapid onset and robust therapeutic effect, the efficacy of MECT varies significantly between individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of MECT in patients with SCZ and identify its influencing factors, with the goal of informing personalised treatment strategies.
Methods:
This retrospective observational study included 237 inpatients with SCZ who received a full course of MECT at the Fourth People's Hospital of Nantong between January 2023 and December 2024. Treatment response was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) reduction rate. Patients were classified into effective (≥50% reduction) and ineffective (<50% reduction) groups. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables were compared between groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of treatment response.
Results:
The overall effectiveness rate of MECT was 70.46%. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥50 years (OR = 0.111-0.078, P = 0.010-0.002) and illness duration ≥10 years (OR = 0.028-0.003, P < 0.05) as negative predictors of response. In contrast, first-episode SCZ (OR=6.537, P = 0.003), higher baseline positive symptom scores (OR = 1.325, P<0.001), and longer EEG seizure duration (OR = 1.183, P<0.001) were positive predictors. No significant associations were found for sex, education level, or stimulus parameters such as current or frequency.
Conclusion:
MECT remains a clinically valuable intervention for SCZ, particularly in younger, first-episode patients with prominent positive symptoms. Treatment efficacy is influenced by age, illness duration, baseline symptom severity, and seizure quality. These findings support the need for personalised MECT protocols guided by clinical and electrophysiological characteristics.
More Related Videos
09:07Electroconvulsive Seizures in Rats and Fractionation of Their Hippocampi to Examine Seizure-induced Changes in Postsynaptic Density Proteins
Published on: August 15, 2017
10:54Conventional Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Step-by-Step Protocol
Published on: November 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Psychosis and Antipsychotic Drugs: Overview