Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Toward Regulatory Convergence and Streamlined Biosimilar Development: Recommendations from an International
Elif Car1, Liese Barbier1, Ingrid Schwarzenberger2
1Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Objectives:
This study aims to assess perspectives of stakeholders on scientific and regulatory challenges associated with biosimilarity demonstration and to formulate consensus-based recommendations to foster regulatory convergence and streamline biosimilar development globally.
Methods:
A modified Nominal Group Technique with an international panel of regulators, academics, and industry representatives involved three phases: (i) first individual grading, (ii) focus group discussions, and (iii) second individual grading. High consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement with a weighted mean score of ≥ 4.0.
Results:
Overall, four focus groups were held in September 2023 with 21 participants (2 academics, 7 regulators, and 12 industry representatives). In total, 22 recommendations were proposed, with 16 obtaining high consensus. Highest-rated recommendations included enhancing stakeholder education on science-based biosimilarity principles (mean score: 4.65/5), promoting regulatory convergence through reliance (mean score: 4.65/5), aligning regulatory requirements based on current scientific knowledge (mean score: 4.60/5), reconsidering the requirement for comparative clinical efficacy studies (mean score: 4.65/5), harmonizing reference product selection criteria (mean score: 4.55/5), facilitating proactive knowledge sharing among regulators (mean score: 4.50/5), eliminating in vivo animal studies (mean score: 4.50/5), and accepting clinical studies conducted for global submissions (mean score: 4.50/5). Two recommendations received the lowest consensus: providing incentives for the development of new pharmacodynamic biomarkers (mean score: 2.80/5) and developing distinct International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines for biosimilar assessment (mean score: 3.20/5).
Conclusions:
The consensus-based recommendations identified in this study outline priority areas and measures for streamlining biosimilar development and fostering regulatory convergence.
More Related Videos
08:31Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
07:43Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence: Overview
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence