Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
Published on: July 11, 2025
Taxonomy based on the biological species concept: the case of the Rhodnius robustus complex (Hemiptera, Triatominae)
Kaio Cesar Chaboli Alevi1,2,3, Amanda Ravazi4, Jader de Oliveira5,6
1Laboratory of Entomology in Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health (FSP), University of Sao Paulo (USP), Avenue Dr. Arnaldo, 715, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil. kaiochaboli@hotmail.com.
Background:
Rhodnius robustus is a paraphyletic taxon composed of different lineages, being lineages II and III currently described as R. montenegrensis and R. marabaensis. However, it has been suggested that two distinct clades may be associated with lineage II: R. montenegrensis and R. robustus II. Among the different species concepts, the biological concept is based mainly on interspecific reproductive isolation. Thus, we performed crosses between R. montenegrensis and R. marabaensis and between R. montenegrensis and R. robustus II, and we revisited and discussed taxonomically and evolutionarily all intra and interspecific crosses of R. robustus sensu lato (s. l.).
Methods:
Reciprocal experimental crosses were conducted between R. montenegrensis with R. marabaensis and R. robustus II. Furthermore, intercrosses were performed up to the fourth (F4) or fifth generation (depending on the reproductive barrier). Finally, cytogenetic analyzes were performed in the gonads to evaluate the degree of pairing of the hybrids' chromosomes.
Results:
Hybrids were obtained in all directions of the crosses. However, crosses between R. montenegrensis females and R. marabaensis males resulted in a very low number of offspring. When intercrosses were performed, the hybrids showed high fertility, possibly resulting from heterosis. Only the F4 was unviable due to hybrid collapse. In the other direction, the hybrids were completely infertile, characterizing the hybrid sterility. Hybrids from crosses between R. montenegrensis females and R. robustus II males died before reaching adulthood (characterizing the hybrid collapse) and in the other direction, no reproductive barriers were observed.
Conclusions:
We demonstrated that, on the basis of the biological species concept, R. montenegrensis and R. marabaensis are valid species and reproductively isolated. Furthermore, we observed partial isolation between R. montenegrensis and R. robustus II, highlighting the need for integrative taxonomy studies to elucidate this clade. Finally, we revisited the literature and observed that: R. robustus s. l. is reproductively isolated from R. nasutus and R. neglectus; with the exception of specimens from Amazonas, R. prolixus does not present reproductive isolation when crossed with R. robustus (from Colombia, Peru and Venezuela); and the "intraspecific" barriers of R. robustus s. l. possibly represent different species (R. montenegrensis, R. marabaensis, and/or R. barretti).
Related Concept Videos
Taxonomy
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
Microbial Classification System
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Pollination and Flower Structure
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Phylogeny

