Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Assessing Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Using an Awake Closed-Head Injury Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 20, 2023
Comparison of Esketamine and Propofol for Prehospital Emergency Anaesthesia in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury-A
Juri Laamanen1, Harry Ljungqvist1, Jouni Nurmi1
1Emergency Medicine and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Background:
Prehospital emergency anaesthesia and controlled ventilation are cornerstones in the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the choice of anaesthetic used during the induction of anaesthesia. Esketamine has gained significant popularity, but its use has been limited in patients with traumatic brain injury due to fears of increased intracranial pressure. A protocol for anaesthesia was implemented at a Finnish helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) unit during 2015 that mandated the use of esketamine over propofol for most patients.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the differences in mortality and physiology in patients with traumatic brain injury, intubated using either propofol or esketamine. We collected data on patients treated by a single HEMS unit in Finland between January 2014 and December 2021. Our primary outcome was mortality before hospital discharge, and our secondary outcome was physiological stability, defined as the frequency of hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg or a decrease of ≥ 10%) after intubation. Controlling for confounders was done through a logistical regression analysis.
Results:
We identified a total of 366 patients, 301 of whom were treated with esketamine and 65 with propofol. There was no significant difference in mortality between the esketamine and propofol groups (odds ratio 0.598, 95% confidence interval 0.281-1.272). The decrease in blood pressure after intubation was greater in the propofol group (absolute change -37.3 vs. -12.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval -38 to -15 mmHg), but because the initial blood pressure was also higher, both groups had similar postintubation physiology.
Conclusion:
In this study, we found no significant difference in mortality, but we found significant differences in the haemodynamic responses between esketamine and propofol, with a slightly favourable haemodynamic profile in patients treated with esketamine. The protocol implemented in 2015 heavily shifted the choice of anaesthetics from propofol to esketamine, but there was a distinct resurgence in propofol use during the study period.
Editorial Comment:
Patients with severe head injuries can receive advance intensive care including anaesthetic drugs in the field for intubation, when prehospital teams have this competence. This retrospective analysis presents a comparison of outcomes for traumatic brain injury cases who received either propofol or esketamine in the prehospital setting, as part of a time-interrupted series where drug choice was changed. While possibly differing in circulatory effects, the two drugs were not associated with a difference in mortality before hospital discharge.
More Related Videos
14:52Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
Published on: January 13, 2018
10:23Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
Published on: June 23, 2023