Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

09:16
High-resolution Patterning Using Two Modes of Electrohydrodynamic Jet: Drop on Demand and Near-field Electrospinning
Published on: July 10, 2018
10.2K
Adjoint-based optimization of open-loop control for microfluidics of an inkjet printhead
Javier Lorente-Macías1, Matthew P Juniper1
1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 22, 2025
Summary
Researchers optimized actuator velocity to cancel acoustic reverberations in inkjet printheads. This method significantly reduces system energy, improving drop ejection control and print quality.
Area of Science:
- Fluid Dynamics
- Acoustics
- Microfluidics
Background:
- Drop-on-demand inkjet printing relies on precise fluid control.
- Acoustic reverberations within printheads can negatively impact droplet ejection and print quality.
- Minimizing energy in microfluidic systems is crucial for efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal actuator velocity profile for canceling acoustic reverberations in inkjet printheads.
- To ensure a specific meniscus state at a defined time after droplet ejection.
- To minimize the total energy of the oscillating flow and surface energy in the microchannel.
Main Methods:
- Formulation of an optimization problem to minimize total system energy (acoustic and surface energy).
- Utilized an adjoint method for efficient gradient computation of the cost function.
- Employed a gradient-based optimization algorithm to find the optimal actuator velocity profile.
Main Results:
- The optimal actuator profile effectively cancels acoustic reverberations within the printhead.
- Actuator action initially reduces surface energy by extracting fluid, followed by wave generation to cancel reverberations.
- Both tested inkjet printhead mechanisms achieved over a 100-fold reduction in total system energy compared to uncontrolled cases.
Conclusions:
- The developed methodology successfully optimizes actuator velocity for acoustic cancellation in inkjet printheads.
- This approach enhances control over the meniscus state and reduces overall system energy.
- Significant energy reduction demonstrates the potential for improved efficiency and performance in drop-on-demand inkjet systems.
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
1.6K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.6K
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving
859
Newtonian fluids exhibit a constant viscosity, meaning their shear stress and shear strain rate are directly proportional. This property ensures a predictable and stable response to applied forces, maintaining a linear relationship between force and flow. Examples include water, air, and light oils, consistently demonstrating this proportional behavior regardless of external conditions.
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
859
Accelerating Fluids
2.1K
When a fluid is in constant acceleration, the pressure and buoyant force equations are modified. Suppose a beaker is placed in an elevator accelerating upward with a constant acceleration, a. In the beaker, assume there is a thin cylinder of height h with an infinitesimal cross-sectional area, ΔS.
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
2.1K

