Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Comparison of classification systems for acute diverticulitis and updating of Helsinki staging
Juha Mali1, Johannes Salusjärvi, Ari Leppäniemi
1From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (J.M., J.S., A.L., P.M., V.S.), and Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery (V.S.), Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Background:
Helsinki classification for acute colonic diverticulitis, based on radiological and clinical parameters, stratifies patients according to their prognosis and recommended treatment into five stages. This study aims to update Helsinki classification to improve it in patients with abscesses and peritonitis and validate the classification by comparing it with other classifications of diverticulitis.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients treated for acute colonic diverticulitis of any stage between 2011 and 2017 and for stages 4 and 5 between 2006 and 2017 in Helsinki University Hospital were included. Performance of classifications was tested with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results:
In total, 2,361 patients were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the highest specificity and sensitivity for abscess cutoff point 50 mm in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, discharge within 14 days, and operative treatment. Patients with Helsinki stage 4 fecal peritonitis had significantly more ICU admissions (38% vs. 12%, p = 0.005) and less ICU-free days (median, 24 vs. 26; p < 0.03), and fewer were discharged within 14 days (48% vs. 72%, p = 0.03) than patients with Helsinki stage 4 purulent peritonitis. Outcomes were similar between stage 4 fecal subgroup and stage 5 patients. Based on these findings, in the updated Helsinki 2.0 classification, abscess diameter cutoff between Helsinki stages 2 and 3 was changed to 50 mm, and fecal peritonitis was defined as belonging to Helsinki stage 5 diverticulitis. Helsinki 2.0 classification had generally at least equal area under the curve (AUC) values (AUC, 0.89-0.95) for mortality and morbidity compared with other classifications of diverticulitis (AUC, 0.83-0.95).
Conclusion:
Updated Helsinki 2.0 classification is an easy-to-use robust pre- and intraoperative classification for acute diverticulitis accurately predicting outcomes and guiding treatment choices.
Level Of Evidence:
Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level III.
More Related Videos
09:11Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model
Published on: February 14, 2021
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography