Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014
Early effects of a microprocessor-controlled knee joint on functional mobility and user satisfaction in veterans with
Ceren Kuzu1, Semra Topuz2,3, Koray Aydemir4
1Gaziler Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Prosthetics and Orthotics Fabrication and Application Center, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
None:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of a polycentric microprocessor-controlled knee joint on functional mobility and user satisfaction.DesignBefore-after pilot trial.SettingTertiary-level physical therapy and rehabilitation hospital.ParticipantsTen adults with unilateral transfemoral or through-knee amputations due to trauma.InterventionTransition from various monocentric microprocessor-controlled knees to a polycentric microprocessor-controlled hydraulic knee.Main measuresFunctional performance assessed using the Timed Up and Go, 6-Minute Walk Test, Hill Assessment Index, Stair Assessment Index, and user satisfaction measured by the Satisfaction with Prosthesis Questionnaire.ResultsThe Time Up and Go and 6-Minute Walk Test showed nonsignificant improvements with moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.43 and 0.58; p = .205 and .098, respectively). No significant change was observed in the Stair Assessment Index. A statistically significant improvement was found in the descend-specific Hill Assessment Index, accompanied by a significant reduction in task duration (r = 0.95; p = .034; Cohen's d = 0.85; p = .025, respectively). User satisfaction demonstrated a positive trend, with a moderate-to-large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.68; p = .059), although this did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsTransitioning to the polycentric microprocessor-controlled knee joint may enhance incline-related mobility in active prosthesis users. The positive trend in user satisfaction suggests potential benefits; however, this requires confirmation in larger studies. Outcomes may be influenced by learning effects and socket comfort variability. These preliminary findings support the need for individualized prosthetic prescriptions and warrant larger, controlled trials with extended follow-up.

