Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Nomogram predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with emergency gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter
Ying Li1, Mengmeng Wu1,2, Lanxin Ouyang1
1Emergency Department, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Insights
This study created a nomogram for emergency departments to predict in-hospital mortality risk in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The tool identifies key risk factors, aiding clinicians in better patient management and prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Prognostics
Background:
- Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) presents a significant clinical challenge in emergency departments (EDs), associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.
- Effective risk stratification tools are crucial for managing patients with emergency GIB and optimizing clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and internally validate an emergency department-based nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality risk in patients with GIB.
- To identify independent risk factors associated with mortality in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort analysis of 847 patients with GIB admitted to Wuhan Central Hospital between January and December 2023.
- Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for variable selection and multivariable logistic regression for nomogram construction.
- Model performance evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analyses.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality rate was 8.85% (75/847). Non-survivors were older and presented with lower blood pressure, higher heart rate, and elevated shock index.
- Independent predictors of mortality included ambulance arrival, shock index > 1, ICU admission, malignancy, and lack of hemostatic procedures.
- The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination with AUCs of 0.862 (training) and 0.846 (validation).
Conclusions:
- The developed nomogram shows good discrimination and calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality in ED patients with GIB.
- This prognostic tool has potential clinical utility for risk stratification and optimizing patient management in emergency settings.
- Integration into clinical information systems could enhance decision support for clinicians managing GIB patients.
Abstract:
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is frequently encountered in emergency departments and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. This study developed and internally validated an emergency department-based nomogram to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients presenting with emergency GIB. Additionally, risk factors influencing mortality rates were identified to provide emergency clinicians with an accurate prognostic tool. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from patients with GIB admitted to three branches of Wuhan Central Hospital (Nanjing Road, Houhu, and Yangchunhu) between January and December 2023. Patient data were obtained from the hospital information system. Key predictive variables were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and a nomogram was constructed via multivariable logistic regression. Model discrimination was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration and decision curve analyses were also performed to evaluate model performance. A total of 847 patients were included, with 75 (8.85%) experiencing in-hospital mortality. Non-survivors were older (median age 73 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.001) and had lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, higher heart rate, and elevated shock index at presentation (all p < 0.001). Ambulance arrival (p < 0.001), Emergency Severity Index Level 1 classification (p < 0.001), and the presence of malignancy (p < 0.001) were more common among those who died. Fewer non-survivors underwent surgical (p = 0.003) or hemostatic procedures (p < 0.001). Ambulance arrival, shock index > 1, ICU admission, malignancy, and hemostatic procedures were identified as independent predictors of mortality. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination, with AUC values of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.786-0.939) in the training cohort and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.787-0.904) in the validation cohort. The developed nomogram demonstrated good discrimination and calibration and may have potential clinical utility for risk stratification in ED patients with GIB. Integration of this model into clinical information systems may assist in risk stratification and optimize patient management.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications