Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Liver Metastases of Uveal Melanoma
Published on: January 25, 2015
Feasibility and Tolerability of Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Embolization for Recurrent/Metastatic Soft Tissue
Jing Li1, Rui Liu2, Bao-Rang Zhu1
1Department of Oncology, the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100071, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of arterial infusion chemotherapy embolization (AICE) in treating recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to explore relevant prognostic factors to tailor future individualized treatment.
Methods:
A total of 113 patients with recurrent/metastatic STS treated with AICE at the Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were adopted and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate prognostic factors. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) standards.
Results:
Among the 113 patients, the median OS was 19.0 months (95% CI: 12.8-25.3) with 2-year OS rates of 45.1%. The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 8.6-13.4) with 2-year PFS rates of 25.7%. Objective response rate (ORR) was 37.2% (95% CI: 28.3%-46.8%) and disease control rate (DCR) was 76.1% (95% CI: 67.1%-83.6%). Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, presence of distant metastasis, number of postoperative treatment regimens, pathological differentiation and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly associated with OS and PFS (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that tumor size, distant metastasis, number of postoperative treatment regimens, pathological differentiation and short-term efficacy were independent prognostic factors for OS (P<0.05). The most common TRAEs were pain (23.0%), transient bone marrow suppression (15.0%) and postoperative fever (6.2%). No severe or fatal adverse reactions and treatment-related mortalities were observed, demonstrating superior tolerability.
Conclusion:
AICE might be a feasible and well-tolerated treatment for recurrent/metastatic STS, effectively controlling disease progression and improving survival outcomes in this retrospective cohort. Further multicenter, large-scale prospective studies were needed to validate these findings and explore the combination of AICE with immunotherapy or targeted therapy to optimize treatment strategy for STS.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

