Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
A Diagnostic Paradigm Shift in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Design of the DIFOCCULT-3 Trial
Emre K Aslanger1, Burcu Aggül2, Özlem Yıldırımtürk3
1Health Sciences University, Başakşehir Pine and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Insights
The new occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) and nonocclusive myocardial infarction (NOMI) paradigm aims to improve acute coronary occlusion (ACO) detection over the traditional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) approach. This study will determine if OMI/NOMI improves patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Current ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) paradigms have limitations in identifying acute coronary occlusion (ACO).
- Delayed diagnosis of ACO can lead to suboptimal patient outcomes.
- A novel pathophysiology-based strategy is needed to improve ACO detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) and nonocclusive myocardial infarction (NOMI) paradigm in improving patient outcomes.
- To compare the OMI/NOMI approach against the traditional STEMI/NSTEMI framework for diagnosing acute coronary occlusion.
- To assess if integrating clinical judgment, ECG subtleties, AI, biomarkers, and imaging enhances ACO detection.
Main Methods:
- The DIFOCCULT-3 trial is a multicenter, modified cluster-randomized, open-label study involving 6,000 participants with suspected myocardial infarction (MI).
- The OMI/NOMI approach utilizes clinical gestalt, AI-supported ECG analysis, and adjunctive diagnostics to identify ACO.
- Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization at 1 year; secondary endpoints include infarct size and ejection fraction.
Main Results:
- Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing.
- Acute outcomes, including earlier ACO identification and infarct size, will be reported post-enrollment.
- Late outcomes, such as mortality and rehospitalization, will be available after 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The DIFOCCULT-3 study will determine if the OMI/NOMI paradigm offers improved outcomes compared to the STEMI/NSTEMI framework.
- Earlier and more accurate ACO identification is hypothesized to be a key benefit of the OMI/NOMI approach.
- This research could lead to a significant advancement in MI care and diagnostics.
Background:
The current ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) paradigm have long been the cornerstone of myocardial infarction (MI) care but fail to identify many patients with acute coronary occlusion (ACO), delaying treatment and worsening outcomes.
Objectives:
The new occlusive MI (OMI) and nonocclusive MI (NOMI) paradigm addresses these limitations by shifting from rigid electrocardiography (ECG)-driven thresholds to a pathophysiology-based strategy. It integrates clinical judgment, ECG subtleties, supportive artificial intelligence, biomarkers, and imaging when needed to actively detect ACO. The current trial investigates whether this approach improves outcomes.
Methods:
The DIFOCCULT-3 (Time for a DIagnostic paradigm shift from ST-elevation/non-ST-elevation to OCClUsion/non-occLusion myocardial infarcTion? trial is a multicenter, modified cluster-randomized, open-label study designed to compare the OMI/NOMI paradigm with the STEMI/NSTEMI approach in 6,000 participants presenting with suspected MI. The OMI/NOMI approach integrates clinical gestalt, artificial intelligence-supported ECG analysis, and adjunctive diagnostic tools to actively identify ACO. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality and all-cause rehospitalization at 1-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints include infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion score index, and accurate diagnosis of ACO.
Results:
Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing; acute outcomes such as earlier identification of ACO and infarct size will be reported after enrollment, and late outcomes including mortality and rehospitalization will be available after 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
The DIFOCCULT-3 study aims to determine whether the OMI/NOMI paradigm represents a significant advancement in MI care by improving outcomes through earlier and more accurate identification of ACO than the STEMI/NSTEMI framework (Time for a Diagnostic Paradigm Shift From STEMI/NSTEMI to OMI/NOMI [DIFOCCULT-3]; NCT06570759).
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
05:58Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction