Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Microfluidics in Assessing Platelet Function
Published on: November 8, 2024
MicroRNA dynamics and their link to platelet function following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Oliver Buchhave Pedersen1, Erik Lerkevang Grove2, Steen Dalby Kristensen2
1Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background:
Reduced effect of antiplatelet therapy has been observed in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MicroRNA (miR) expression may serve as biomarkers for platelet function and the effect of antiplatelet therapy.
Aim:
In acute STEMI patients, we investigated changes in miR expression from the acute event to a more stable phase, and evaluated their association with platelet function at both time points to assess their potential as biomarkers of antiplatelet therapy efficacy.
Methods:
Patients admitted with acute STEMI for primary percutaneous coronary intervention were included and treated according to guidelines. Samples were collected within 24 h after admission and at 2-3 months after enrolment. Expression of candidate miRs, platelet reactivity markers evaluated by flow cytometry, platelet impedance aggregometry and serum thromboxane B2 were measured at both time points.
Results:
Samples were obtained in 44 STEMI patients. Two miRs (miR-15a-5p and miR-21-5p) showed lower, whereas five (miR-26b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-223-3p and miR-423-5p) showed higher expression at follow-up than at baseline. At baseline, miR-26b-5p expression consistently correlated with the expression of the fibrinogen receptor on activated platelets, across different agonists (rho: from 0.29 to 0.32, p < 0.05). At follow-up, miR-93-5p expression was associated with platelet aggregation using various agonists (rho: from -0.39 to -0.47, p < 0.02).
Conclusions:
Seven miRs were differentially expressed at follow-up compared to baseline. Several miRs were linked to platelet function at baseline and follow-up, suggesting that a single miR may not be sufficient as a biomarker for platelet function and the effect of antiplatelet therapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Structure and Function of Platelets
Platelets are continually replenished, circulating in the bloodstream for 9-12 days before being removed by phagocytes, primarily in the spleen. A microliter of circulating blood contains between 150,000 and 450,000...
MicroRNAs
MicroRNAs

