Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Evaluation of a digital health decision intervention to support management decision-making for adults with hearing
Melanie A Ferguson1,2, Kerry A Sherman3,4, Ellen Bothe5,2
1Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Melanie.Ferguson@curtin.edu.au.
Introduction:
Hearing loss is highly prevalent and impacts many aspects of a person's life, including communication, social engagement, employment, general health and well-being. Yet, many people do not access hearing healthcare and are unaware of the range of hearing healthcare options available. Barriers to hearing healthcare include poor understanding of hearing loss and its impact; poor knowledge of help-seeking for hearing healthcare options; minimal support to help decide which option is best; and stigma related to hearing loss. These barriers lead to many people not receiving the hearing healthcare they need. Guided by theories of behaviour change and implementation science, HearChoice, an online tailored decision support intervention, has been co-developed to empower adults with hearing difficulties by offering them choice and control over their own hearing healthcare. HearChoice aims to facilitate informed decisions, accessibility and uptake of hearing healthcare, including a wide range of interventions, for adults with hearing difficulties. The objectives of the trial are to evaluate the effectiveness, health economics and feasibility of HearChoice.
Methods And Analysis:
This online randomised controlled trial will recruit participants with hearing difficulties across Australia, with an anticipated sample size of 640. Participants will be randomised to either HearChoice (treatment) or an Australia-specific Hearing Option Grid (active control), both delivered online. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline when the interventions will be offered, at 7 days post-intervention (primary endpoint) and at 3 months post-intervention. An email reminder will be sent at 1-month post-intervention. The primary outcome is decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include measures of readiness and self-efficacy to take action, hearing-related quality of life and empowerment, assessment of the value and impact of HearChoice, work performance and health, and feasibility measures. Primary analysis will compare outcomes between HearChoice and the active control at the primary endpoint.
Ethics And Dissemination:
The study was approved by the Curtin University Human Ethics Committee (HRE2023-0024). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to participation. A broad dissemination plan of the study findings includes peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations, articles and presentations for the wider community and public written in lay and accessible language, and social media.
Trial Registration Number:
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624001139561).
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
11:39Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
