Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Community versus institutionalised care for people with severe mental illness in five countries in Southeast Europe:
Laura Shields-Zeeman1,2, Filip Smit2,3, Ben Wijnen2
1Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands lshields-zeeman@trimbos.nl.
Background:
The RECOVER-E project implemented community-based mental healthcare (CMH) oriented at functional recovery in people with schizophrenia, bipolar and severe major depressive disorder in five countries: Bulgaria, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Romania, with the aim to shift care from institutions to communities.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of CMH under real-world circumstances across various healthcare ecologies and contexts.
Methods:
A randomised comparison of CMH versus treatment as usual (TAU) based on pooled data from all five RECOVER-E trials (N=931). Outcomes were personal and social role functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0) and health-related quality of life (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-3 Levels) at baseline, 12 and 18 months postbaseline. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted with mixed modelling and a sensitivity analysis adjusted for the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare delivery and outcomes.
Findings:
At 18-month follow-up, CMH had a 4.55 lower WHODAS disability score than TAU, which was significant (b=-4.55, SE=1.21, z=-3.75, p<0.001), and improved quality of life by 0.07 utility (b=0.07, SE=0.014, z=4.56, p<0.001) equivalent to an additional 25 days in full health. Similar effects were observed in each of the five countries and for all WHODAS subdomains (cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along with people, life activities, participation). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for the confounding effect of COVID-19 showed similar effects.
Clinical Implications:
Recovery-oriented CMH for people with severe mental illness was effective in improving functioning and quality of life for people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and severe depression in five South-Eastern European countries and could be implemented across different health systems.
Trial Registration Numbers:
Bulgaria: NCT03922425, Croatia: NCT03862209, Macedonia: NCT03892473, Montenegro: NCT03837340, Romania: NCT03884933.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
