Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Machine learning-based prediction of compressive energy absorption in shoe soles with different features
Mohammad Mahdi Mohammadi1, Amir Nourani2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
None:
This study conducted 537 force-controlled compression tests on shoe soles to measure strain energy. Various features were studied, including midsole and outsole structures, sole geometry, sole hardness, and loading conditions including applied compression force, angle, and loading speed. Strain energies during compression tests were recorded, followed by correlation analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey tests. Subsequently, different machine learning (ML) algorithms-i.e., simple linear regression (SLR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)-were applied for curve fitting. The correlation matrix revealed that strain energy exhibits a strong dependence on the applied force (correlation = 0.89), which stands out significantly compared to other features. This is followed by geometry and shoe hardness, both of which show a correlation of approximately 0.25. To validate these findings, ANOVA tests were conducted, and all p values were significant (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was found that auxetic midsole structures achieve similar strain energy values as simple midsoles (mean = 2.978 J), while maintaining a lighter overall weight. In contrast, weight-reducing holes were not as effective (mean = 2.080 J). It was also shown that initial contact position (i.e., changed with the compression angle) can affect the strain energy; that is, initial contact with the heel generates less strain energy (mean = 2.643 J) compared to the first touch with the toes (mean = 2.839 J). After tuning ML hyperparameters through grid search, RF outperformed other models (MSE = 0.0089), followed by SVR with polynomial kernel (MSE = 0.0105), SVR with RBF kernel (MSE = 0.0146), and MLP (MSE = 0.0251). The developed models offer a practical tool for shoe manufacturers to optimize sole designs and prevent injury during high-stress activities.
More Related Videos
08:39Fabrication of Compressed Hosiery and Measurement of its Pressure Characteristic Exerted on the Lower Limbs
Published on: May 27, 2020
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Elasticity in Concrete
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving