Immunosuppressive therapy in patients with biopsy-proven inflammatory myocardial disease: a systematic review and
Bruno Stautner1, Michał Tkaczyszyn2,3, Anne Sorg4
1Deutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. bruno.stautner@dhzc-charite.de.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and update the effects of immunosuppressive therapy on heart failure outcomes in patients aged 16 years or older with biopsy-proven inflammatory myocardial disease. We performed a systematic review and an aggregate data meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effects of such therapy in acute and chronic myocarditis or inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. Studies were chosen based on criteria related to clinical relevance for therapeutic decisions and measured outcomes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with manual reference checks. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. We used a random-effects model and assessed heterogeneity with I2 and τ2 statistics. . Seven eligible studies with a total of 594 patients were included, that investigated clinical course of acute and chronic myocarditis and inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. At 3 months, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for LVEF was 0.97 (95% CI -0.05 to 1.99; p > 0.05). At 6 months, the pooled SMD was 0.48 (95% CI -1.31 to 2.28), and at 12 months, -0.01 (95% CI -1.65 to 1.62). For NYHA classification, pooled SMDs were 0.02 (95% CI -0.21 to 0.25) at 3 months and -0.22 (95% CI -1.56 to 1.11) at 12 months. In all cases, confidence intervals crossed zero. Heterogeneity remained high (I2 = 92-97%), reflecting substantial variability across studies. In patients with acute or chronic myocarditis or inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy, immunosuppressive therapy does not improve key echocardiographic or clinical parameters when adding new data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). High heterogeneity suggests variability in patient populations and protocols, highlighting the need for well-designed RCTs. There is still no evidence to support routine endomyocardial biopsy in non-severe disease, as it will not impact symptomatic treatment, even if inflammation is present.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and update the effects of immunosuppressive therapy on heart failure outcomes in patients aged 16 years or older with biopsy-proven inflammatory myocardial disease. We performed a systematic review and an aggregate data meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effects of such therapy in acute and chronic myocarditis or inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. Studies were chosen based on criteria related to clinical relevance for therapeutic decisions and measured outcomes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with manual reference checks. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. We used a random-effects model and assessed heterogeneity with I2 and τ2 statistics. . Seven eligible studies with a total of 594 patients were included, that investigated clinical course of acute and chronic myocarditis and inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. At 3 months, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for LVEF was 0.97 (95% CI -0.05 to 1.99; p > 0.05). At 6 months, the pooled SMD was 0.48 (95% CI -1.31 to 2.28), and at 12 months, -0.01 (95% CI -1.65 to 1.62). For NYHA classification, pooled SMDs were 0.02 (95% CI -0.21 to 0.25) at 3 months and -0.22 (95% CI -1.56 to 1.11) at 12 months. In all cases, confidence intervals crossed zero. Heterogeneity remained high (I2 = 92-97%), reflecting substantial variability across studies. In patients with acute or chronic myocarditis or inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy, immunosuppressive therapy does not improve key echocardiographic or clinical parameters when adding new data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). High heterogeneity suggests variability in patient populations and protocols, highlighting the need for well-designed RCTs. There is still no evidence to support routine endomyocardial biopsy in non-severe disease, as it will not impact symptomatic treatment, even if inflammation is present.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
01:14Myocarditis III: Medical Management
01:22Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
01:21Myocarditis I: Introduction
01:17Pericarditis III: Medical Management
01:21Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management