Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Dietary Restraint: Far Too Complex to Dismiss as a Fallacy
Marle Alvarenga1, César Moraes1,2
1Postgraduate Program in Nutrition in Public Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract:
In her commentary Dietary Restraint Fallacy, Jansen argues that the theory linking dietary restraint to binge eating and weight gain can be dismissed as a "fallacy." This conclusion is largely drawn from Grilo and Pittman, who found that rigid restraint was associated with reduced binge frequency and greater weight loss. We contend that dietary restraint remains a profoundly complex and unsettled issue, with implications for weight regain and eating disorder prevention. Importantly, the three Commentaries on Grilo and Pittman were invited simultaneously. Readers encountering only one of them may not realize that these papers were designed to present contrasting viewpoints. In this Commentary, we stress why restraint theory cannot be dismissed wholesale, highlight the need for integration between obesity and eating disorders fields, and emphasize that premature simplifications risk distorting both scientific understanding and clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
Dietary Connections
Confirmation Biases
Self-Regulation
Self-Schemas
Self-Discrepancy Theory

