Peer workers as facilitators of psychiatric advance directives: a mixed-methods study on recovery

To evaluate whether and how drafting psychiatric advance directives (PADs) with the support of a peer worker improves recovery outcomes for individuals with severe mental illness.

A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative data from a randomized trial with qualitative interviews. The trial included adults with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or schizoaffective disorder who had experienced involuntary hospitalization in the past year. Participants either completed PADs with peer worker support or without specific facilitation. Recovery was assessed longitudinally using the Recovery Assessment Scale. Thematic analysis of interviews explored mechanisms underpinning the effectiveness of peer facilitation.

A total of 118 participants completed PADs, 84 with peer support. Mixed-effects regression analysis revealed significantly higher recovery scores for those supported by peer workers (coefficient = 4.77, p = 0.03). Qualitative findings highlighted two key mechanisms: peer workers' boundary role fostering trust and relational symmetry and their facilitation practices promoting critical reflexivity and addressing past psychiatric trauma. Participants emphasized the flexibility and empathy of peer workers, which enabled deeper reflection and empowerment.

Peer facilitation enhances the drafting of PADs, significantly contributing to recovery through trust, critical reflection, and trauma-informed approaches. These findings support the integration of peer workers into PAD frameworks and emphasize the need for tailored training and systemic reforms to maximize their impact.