Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Testing the ABCs of Serious Illness Program for Oncology Trainees: A Feasibility Trial Comparing Different Learning
Oren Levine1, Jeff Myers2, Shilpa Jyothi Kumar1
1Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Background:
ABCs (All providers, Better Communication skills) of serious illness communication is a novel curriculum that could enhance postgraduate oncology training. The program combines electronic learning modules (ELMs), standardized patient (SP) encounters, and coaching, all in a virtual format. We assessed feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing different training experiences.
Methods:
We conducted a pilot for a RCT at three academic centers. Postgraduate oncology trainees were randomized to complete ELMs and SP encounters with coaching (intervention arm) versus ELMs only (control arm). Feasibility measures comprised the primary analysis. Secondary analyses explored the impact of different training experiences. Outcomes were measured through pre- and post-intervention simulation-based assessments (COM-ON rating scale), and surveys rating self-efficacy (End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey [EPCS] score) and satisfaction.
Results:
Twenty-three learners participated (37% recruitment). Adherence was 100% and data collection was near complete. All feasibility metrics were met except for the recruitment target of 75%. Self-efficacy ratings improved from baseline (EPCS score increased significantly (p < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.73 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.78) [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-1.08]), as did quality of communication in simulations (COM-ON score increased significantly (p < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.59 (SD = 0.73) [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]). Improvement was greatest in the intervention arm for both. Participants reported high satisfaction with virtual learning.
Conclusions:
Recruitment was below target, but study activities were feasible in virtual format. The curriculum improved communication skills. The addition of virtual SPs and coaching optimized learning. The curriculum was associated with improved self-efficacy rating for serious illness communication with oncology patients. Lessons learned will support further medical education research in this area.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation