Dual-Task Interference Increases Variability in Sub-Second Repetitive Motor Timing

Objectives: Sub-second motor timing is critical for skilled performance in domains such as sport, music, and safety-critical multitasking; however, its robustness under cognitive load remains unresolved. Dual-task paradigms offer a method to test whether attentional demands selectively disrupt temporal precision. This study intended to investigate the effects of cognitive load on rhythmic finger tapping at a sub-second interval. Methods: A sample of 103 college students (19-25 years) performed a synchronization-continuation tapping task at 500 ms intervals under single- and dual-task conditions across five trials. The dual-task condition included a distracting letter-span task imposing working memory load. Inter-response intervals (IRIs), their variability (IRI SD), and accuracy (AI) were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Tapping intervals were consistently shorter than the 500 ms target by approximately 70 ms in both conditions, showing anticipatory mechanisms that remained stable under cognitive load. Mean accuracy did not vary between single- and dual-task conditions. By contrast, temporal variability was significantly higher in the dual-task condition, reflecting diminished trial-to-trial consistency. These effects continued throughout trials and were supported by model estimates, which indicated robust between-subject variability but selective disruption of consistency rather than mean performance. Conclusions: Dual-tasking selectively hinders temporal stability in sub-second motor timing while ensuring that the reproduction and accuracy of the mean interval remain unchanged. This pattern supports dual-process accounts of timing, suggesting distinct roles for predictive control and attentional allocation. The results have applied relevance for situations requiring precise rhythmic performance under cognitive load, including sports, ensemble music, and safety-critical tasks.