Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Incidental esophageal and gastroesophageal junction uptake on ¹8F-FDG PET/CT: when is upper endoscopy warranted?
Yihan Cao1, Bashar Kako1, Ashkan Eighaei Sedeh1
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.
Objectives:
To identify imaging features that differentiate malignant lesions from non-malignant conditions associated with incidental uptake in the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Methods:
Patients were included if they (1) underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT between January 2009 and July 2023, with reports documenting incidental uptake in the esophagus or GEJ and recommending upper endoscopy; and (2) had upper endoscopy within one year of the PET scan. Patients with known esophageal or GEJ cancer were excluded. 18F-FDG PET/CT images were assessed for uptake location, pattern (diffuse, segmental, or focal), eccentricity (circumferential or eccentric), maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVs), and CT findings (normal, wall thickening, or mass). Patients were categorized into benign conditions, Barrett's esophagus, and malignancies based on endoscopic and pathological diagnoses.
Results:
A total of 106 patients were included, comprising 82 cases of benign conditions, 11 Barrett's esophagus, and 13 malignancies. 18F-FDG PET/CT features were not significantly different between Barrett's esophagus and benign conditions. Compared with the Barrett's esophagus and benign conditions, malignant lesions showed a higher frequency of isolated mid-esophageal uptake (2.2% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.048), eccentric uptake (2.2% vs. 38.5%, P < 0.001), and wall thickening or mass on CT (15.1% vs. 92.4%, P < 0.001). Lesion SUVmax/liver SUVmean demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in predicting malignancies (area under the curve 0.94). The presence of at least one of the following five features yielded 100% sensitivity, 65.6% specificity, and 28.9% positive predictive value for malignancies: focal uptake, eccentric uptake, isolated mid-esophageal uptake, lesion SUVmax/liver SUVmean ≥ 2.8, and wall thickening or mass on CT. The presence of at least two of these features increased specificity to 94.6% while maintaining 100% sensitivity.
Conclusion:
Any of the five incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging features in the esophagus or GEJ warrant endoscopy.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

