Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Using a Knee Arthrometer to Evaluate Tissue-specific Contributions to Knee Flexion Contracture in the Rat
Published on: November 9, 2018
From variability to consistency: building a Kellgren-Lawrence gonarthrosis dataset
Salih Beyaz1, Sahika Betul Yayli2, Kutay Kılıç2
1Adana Turgut Noyan Research and Training Centre, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey. sbeyaz@baskent.edu.tr.
Orthopedic surgeons demonstrated better agreement in Kellgren-Lawrence staging compared to radiologists. Grouping stages into early (KL ≤ 2) and advanced (KL ≥ 3) improved reliability for AI dataset development.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Orthopedics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) staging is crucial for assessing gonarthrosis severity.
- Variability in KL staging among healthcare professionals can impact clinical decision-making and AI development.
- Standardized datasets are essential for reliable AI-driven solutions in osteoarthritis management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate interobserver variability in Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) staging between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.
- To compare the reliability of KL staging on a 0-4 scale versus a two-category system (early/advanced).
- To inform the creation of unbiased datasets for AI-driven gonarthrosis solutions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 15,159 knee radiographs from patients aged 18+.
- Independent KL staging by two radiologists and two orthopedic surgeons.
- Consensus evaluation by two experienced orthopedic specialists.
- Assessment using both a 0-4 scale and a two-category (KL ≤ 2 vs. KL ≥ 3) classification.
Main Results:
- Orthopedic surgeons showed fair to moderate agreement (κ=0.18-0.307) with experts, while radiologists showed slight to fair agreement (κ=0.085-0.172) on the 0-4 KL scale.
- The two-category classification (early/advanced) significantly improved inter-rater reliability for orthopedic surgeons (κ=0.637-0.692) compared to radiologists (κ=0.183-0.230).
- Highest intra-professional agreement was between two radiologists (κ=0.55) on the 0-4 scale and two orthopedic surgeons (κ=0.642) in the two-category system.
Conclusions:
- Orthopedic surgeons exhibit higher interobserver agreement in KL staging, especially for advanced stages (KL ≥ 3), compared to radiologists.
- Classifying KL stages into early (KL ≤ 2) and advanced (KL ≥ 3) groups enhances reliability.
- This simplified classification aids in developing standardized, unbiased datasets for AI in gonarthrosis management.
Related Concept Videos
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

