Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

08:02
A Mouse Ear Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation
Published on: March 24, 2023
4.8K
Nickel Contact Allergy in an Australian Patch Testing Centre Over 2014-2023
Thomas R Brasher1, Amanda Palmer1, Rosemary Nixon1
1Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre, Skin Health Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Australasian Journal of Dermatology
|October 25, 2025
Summary
Nickel dermatitis (NiACD) prevalence is decreasing in Australia, while nickel allergy remains stable. This study tracked trends in nickel allergy and NiACD over a decade.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Allergology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Nickel is the primary cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).
- Limited data exists on the prevalence and trends of nickel-related ACD (NiACD) in Australia.
- Understanding these trends is crucial for public health initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence and temporal trends of nickel contact allergy.
- To investigate the prevalence and trends of nickel-related allergic contact dermatitis (NiACD) in Australia.
- To analyze demographic and clinical features associated with NiACD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective audit of 3582 patients patch tested for nickel sulphate allergy (2014-2023).
- Assessment of nickel exposure relevance by consultant dermatologists.
- Statistical analysis using Pearson's chi-squared and Cochran-Armitage tests for trends.
Main Results:
- Nickel contact allergy prevalence was 16.0% (573/3582).
- NiACD prevalence was 4.7% (169/3582), showing a significant decreasing trend from 2014-2023 (P=0.0002).
- Nickel contact allergy prevalence remained stable; 11.8% of NiACD cases were occupationally related, with high comorbidity rates for atopic dermatitis, asthma, and allergic rhinitis.
Conclusions:
- A declining trend in NiACD prevalence was observed in the Australian patient cohort studied.
- Nickel contact allergy prevalence remained stable during the study period.
- The findings highlight a shift in NiACD epidemiology, potentially influenced by public health measures or environmental factors.

