Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
GenAI in nutritional sciences (GAINS): A systematic review and reporting framework for future research
Bettina Hieronimus1, Maria-Laura Lopez-Aguirre2, Marc Birringer3
1Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots show potential for nutritional advice, but are not yet ready for unsupervised use due to limitations with complex cases and occasional inaccuracies. Further research is needed to improve their reliability.
Area of Science:
- Nutritional Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare.
- LLM-powered chatbots are being explored for their potential to offer nutritional guidance.
- Existing evidence on the quality of chatbot-provided nutritional advice requires synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the quality of nutritional advice from LLM-powered chatbots.
- To assess the suitability of chatbots for advice on metabolic diseases, food allergies, nutrient intake, and pregnancy/lactation nutrition.
- To identify limitations and methodological gaps in current research.
Main Methods:
- A pre-registered systematic review (CRD42025619448) was conducted.
- An extensive search identified 2469 records, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria.
- Standardized data extraction and quality evaluations were performed.
Main Results:
- LLM-powered chatbots show potential but struggle with complex cases and may provide incorrect information.
- Substantial methodological heterogeneity was found in evaluation criteria and study design.
- Limitations include subjective measures and lack of reproducibility testing.
Conclusions:
- LLM-powered chatbots demonstrate potential for supporting nutritional advice but are not yet suitable for unsupervised use.
- Significant methodological gaps necessitate improved rigor, transparency, and comparability in future studies.
- A proposed reporting guideline, Generative AI in Nutritional Sciences (GAINS), aims to address these gaps.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
Proteins: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Genomics
What is Genetic Engineering?

