Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Lung cancer screening CT acquisition protocols for three generations of CT systems conforming to German legislation
Stefan Sawall1, Joscha Maier2, Christian H Ziener3
1Division of X-Ray Imaging and CT, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Objective:
Develop a computed tomography (CT) acquisition protocol for lung cancer screening compliant with German legislation across three CT system generations, addressing standardization of image quality and radiation dose amid technical variability.
Materials And Methods:
Three CT systems, a first-generation dual-source energy-integrating (EID) CT (Somatom Flash), a second-generation dual-source EID CT (Somatom Force), and a photon-counting CT (Naeotom Alpha), were evaluated. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom with fat rings was used to simulate small, medium, and large patients and included lesions with 150 HU contrast. Image quality was quantified via contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at multiple dose levels. Focus was placed on the system-specific adaptation of acquisition and reconstruction parameters, reflecting the challenges faced in harmonizing imaging protocols across diverse hardware generations.
Results:
At matched CTDI, CNR varied markedly, with newer systems performing best. Thicker slices improved CNR. To reach the defined target of a CNR of 2.2 on 3.0 mm slices, the required CTDI were, in the small phantom, Flash and Force about 0.37 mGy and Alpha 0.26-0.19 mGy. In the medium phantom, Flash 1.30 mGy, Force about 0.96 mGy, and Alpha 0.46-0.24 mGy. In the large phantom, Flash 3.34 mGy, Force 5.15 mGy, and Alpha 2.08-0.69 mGy. Required dose increased with phantom size and differed by system generation, underscoring the clinical difficulty of "one-size-fits-all" dose specifications.
Conclusions:
Uniform protocol implementation across CT platforms is challenged by hardware and reconstruction disparities. Patient-size-adapted and system-specific protocols are essential to balance diagnostic performance and radiation safety for future lung cancer screening programs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

