Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
COMPEL: osimertinib plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC and progression on
N Peled1, A Tufman2, L V Sequist3
1Division of Oncology, Helmsley Cancer Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center & The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Background:
COMPEL (NCT04765059) was a global, randomized, double-blind study that evaluated osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following non-central nervous system (CNS) progression on first-line osimertinib.
Patients And Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib 80 mg, or placebo, once daily (o.d.) in combination with chemotherapy [cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (q3w) for four cycles], followed by osimertinib 80 mg, or placebo, o.d. in combination with maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 q3w) until progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included CNS PFS according to CNS metastases status at baseline and overall survival (OS).
Results:
Ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned (49 per arm). Median PFS in all patients was 8.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-11.8 months] with osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus 4.4 months (95% CI 3.5-5.6 months) with placebo plus chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.70]. CNS PFS was longer with osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27-1.13) in patients without baseline CNS metastases (n = 75). Median OS in all patients was 15.9 months (95% CI 12.4-20.8 months) with osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus 9.8 months (95% CI 8.4-17.2 months) with placebo plus chemotherapy (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.23). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred more frequently with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (63%) than placebo plus chemotherapy (46%).
Conclusions:
In patients with non-CNS progression on first-line osimertinib, osimertinib plus chemotherapy was associated with improved PFS and longer OS compared with placebo plus chemotherapy. These findings support osimertinib as a backbone treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC through lines of therapy.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...