Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Evaluating the Gail Model: Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Melissa Rangel1, Shirlene Paul1, Dipti Gupta1
1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background:
The Gail Model, a breast cancer risk calculator initially developed using data from primarily White women, has undergone recalibration using more diverse populations. However, concerns remain that risk is underestimated for certain racial groups.
Methods:
This retrospective study evaluated the Gail Model's performance across different racial groups. Electronic medical record data from 31,256 women aged 25-75 who underwent mammograms between July 2020 and June 2023 were collected. The cohort included 11,589 Black/African American, 11,008 White, 5,872 Hispanic/Latino, 1,429 Asian, and 1,358 individuals identifying as other.
Results:
Significant differences in high-risk (HR) classification based on Gail scores were observed across racial groups. High-risk classification was highest among White women at 11.4%. Black compared with White women had an odds ratio (OR) 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.2-0.28) of HR classification. This difference persisted when controlling for all other variables. Breast cancer diagnosis rates were similar between Black (1.57%) and White women (1.6%).
Conclusions:
These findings indicate a racial disparity in HR classification using the Gail Model. Black women are less likely to be identified as HR despite having comparable rates of cancer to White women. These results highlight the potential limitations of risk assessment algorithms incorporating race as a variable.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk

