Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
Published on: January 29, 2014
Corrigendum to "Auditory and language development in children with cochlear implants: A retrospective longitudinal
Merve İkiz Bozsoy1, Esra Yücel2
1Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the auditory and language development in children with unilateral cochlear implants (UnCIs), sequential bilateral cochlear implants (SeqBiCIs), and simulatenous bilateral cochlear implants (SimBiCIs).
Methods:
This retrospective longitudinal study included 28 children: 9 with UnCIs, 11 with SeqBiCIs, and 8 with SimBiCIs. Auditory and language development were assessed using the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and the Test of Early Language Development-Third Edition (TELD-3), respectively. MAIS scores were collected at three time points: preoperatively (pre-op), and at two postoperative followups (post-op1 and post-op2). TELD-3 scores were obtained at two postoperative time points, corresponding to post-op1 and post-op2 assessments.
Results:
The MAIS score comparisons showed no significant differences between the UnCIs, SeqBiCIs, and SimBiCI groups in the pre-op evaluation (p = 0.22). At post-op1, significant differences observed (p = 0.004), with SeqBiCIs outperforming UnCIs (p = 0.004). At post-op2, MAIS scores differed significantly (p = 0.001), with bilateral groups scoring higher than UnCIs (SeqBiCIs vs. UnCIs, p = 0.006; SimBiCIs vs. UnCIs, p = 0.001). TELD-3 receptive language scores did not differ at post-op1 (p = 0.13), but were significantly higher in SimBiCIs than SeqBiCIs (p = 0.002) and UnCIs (p = 0.011) at post-op2. Expressive language scores showed no group differences at post-op1 (p = 0.19), but were significantly higher in SimBiCIs compared to SeqBiCIs (p = 0.013) and UnCIs (p = 0.002) at post-op2. Mixed ANOVA analyses indicated that the fastest auditory and language development in SimBiCIs, followed by SeqBiCIs, with UnCIs showing the slowest progress.
Conclusion:
Bilateral cochlear implantation, particularly when performed simultaneously, yields superior outcomes in auditory and language development compared to unilateral implantation.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024