Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Patient Directed Recording of a Bipolar Three-Lead Electrocardiogram using a Smartwatch with ECG Function
Published on: December 11, 2019
Universal Atrial Fibrillation Screening Using Electrocardiographic Artificial Intelligence: A Cost-Effective Approach
Wei-Ting Liu1, Chin-Sheng Lin1, Chin Lin2,3,4
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
None:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly contributes to the incidence of strokes. Screening for AF enhances its detection and effective management. However, universal AF screening in rural areas poses a challenge. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-enabled 12-lead electrocardiography (AI-ECG) model for AF screening in rural communities.This cost-effectiveness analysis targeted individuals aged 65 or older, employing a lifelong decision analytic Markov model. AI-ECG model, trained and validated at three Taiwanese hospitals with 285,108 patients, achieved sensitivities of 97.8% and specificities of 99.1%. The study incorporated costs and efficacy of anticoagulant treatments, health status utilities, and clinical variables, derived from literature and Taiwan's epidemiological data. Outcomes were expressed in US dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The base-case analysis contrasted AI-ECG screening performed by nurses and physician evaluations using standard 12-lead ECGs against no screening, incorporating uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results were compared with one GDP per capita in Taiwan (≈$32,327 per QALY), a commonly cited willingness-to-pay (WTP) benchmark.Both AI-ECG and physician-led screenings were costlier yet more effective compared with no screening. Although both methods showed comparable effectiveness in detecting AF and in QALYs gained, AI-ECG screening was less expensive ($141 versus $196). Based on 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations, AI-based screening is more cost-effective at lower thresholds ($4,349 to $6,132 per QALY), while physician-led screening becomes preferable beyond $6,132 per QALY. Both strategies remained cost-effective relative to the WTP benchmark. Sensitivity analyses further identified the referral rate following a positive AI-ECG screening as a critical determinant of its cost-effectiveness.AI-ECG screening for AF is a cost-effective alternative, particularly suitable for areas with limited medical resources.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...