Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in adults with
Silvia Amoretti1,2, Juan Jesús Crespín1,3,4, Montse Corrales1,2,3,4
1Group of Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addiction, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)https://ror.org/01d5vx451, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with psychosocial functioning difficulties and valid measures of disability are needed for this population. The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is widely used to measure disability but has not been validated in the adult ADHD population.
Aims:
This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in adults with ADHD, and to examine differences in disability levels between ADHD subtypes and gender.
Method:
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 577 adults with ADHD (mean age: 38.24, s.d = 12.23; 52.3% male). ADHD severity was assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, while functionality was measured with the WHODAS 2.0 and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). Analyses included: (a) Cronbach's α for internal consistency, (b) Pearson's correlation for convergent validity, (c) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for factor structure and (d) t-tests to compare disability levels across ADHD subtypes and gender.
Results:
The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Scores were significantly correlated with psychosocial functioning (FAST, r = 0.476, p < 0.001) and clinical measures. CFA supported the original six-factor structure (root mean square error of approximation 0.039, Comparative Fit Index 0.998, Tucker-Lewis Index 0.996). When comparing ADHD subtypes, participants with the combined subtype had higher WHODAS 2.0 total scores than those with the inattentive subtype (p = 0.006). Additionally, gender differences were identified, with females displaying higher disability levels (p = 0.005).
Conclusions:
The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrates psychometric properties that suggest it is a valid and reliable tool for assessing disability in adults with ADHD.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

