Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols using T-Scan III: An observational study.
Arezoo Jahanbin1, Haniyeh Ghorbaninezhad2, Mostafa Abtahi1
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Mashhad, Iran. jahanbinA@mums.ac.ir, abtahim@mums.ac.ir Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Department of Orthodontics School of Dentistry Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran jahanbinA@mums.ac.ir abtahim@mums.ac.ir.
This study found no significant differences in occlusal contacts or force intensity between Essix and Occless Essix retainers after three months of orthodontic retention. Both retainer types effectively maintained occlusion without causing statistically significant changes.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Biomaterials
- Occlusion Analysis
Background:
- The retention phase is critical in orthodontics to prevent relapse after treatment.
- Clear aligner retainers like Essix are popular but may affect occlusal contacts.
- Occless Essix retainers were developed to potentially improve occlusal contact preservation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare occlusal changes over three months between Essix and Occless Essix retainers.
- To evaluate the impact of retainer design on anterior and posterior occlusal contacts and intensities.
- To utilize the T-scan III system for quantitative occlusal analysis.
Main Methods:
- An analytical observational study involving 30 orthodontic patients.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Essix retainer and Occless Essix retainer.
- Occlusal contacts and intensities were measured using the T-scan III system at baseline and three months post-debonding.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed in occlusal contact intensity or number between the two retainer groups after three months.
- Minor non-significant trends showed slight increases in anterior contacts for Essix and posterior contacts for Occless Essix retainers.
- P-values for changes in contact intensity and number were not statistically significant (P=0.17 and P<0.05 respectively).
Conclusions:
- Both Essix and Occless Essix retainers demonstrated comparable outcomes in maintaining occlusal stability over a three-month period.
- Neither retainer type showed statistically significant adverse effects on occlusal contacts or force distribution.
- Further long-term studies may be warranted to assess the sustained efficacy of these orthodontic retainers.

