Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols using T-Scan III: An observational study
Arezoo Jahanbin1, Haniyeh Ghorbaninezhad2, Mostafa Abtahi1
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Mashhad, Iran. jahanbinA@mums.ac.ir, abtahim@mums.ac.ir Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Department of Orthodontics School of Dentistry Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran jahanbinA@mums.ac.ir abtahim@mums.ac.ir.
Introduction:
The retention phase in orthodontics is essential for maintaining corrected occlusion and preventing relapse. Clear retainers like Essix are popular for their aesthetics and affordability, but their occlusal coverage might impact anterior and posterior contacts. Modified versions, such as Occless Essix, have been introduced to address these concerns. The aim of this study was to compare occlusal changes over time between Essix and Occless Essix retainers using the T-scan III system.
Materials And Methods:
This analytical observational study involved 30 orthodontic patients treated with MBT 0.022-inch brackets and first premolar extractions. Patients were divided into two groups: one with Essix retainers and the other with Occless Essix retainers. Occlusal contacts and their intensities in anterior and posterior regions were recorded immediately after debonding (T0) and three months later (T1) using the T-scan III system. Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney, T-test, and Chi-square tests, with significance set at 5%.
Results:
After three months, the Occless Essix group showed increased posterior contact intensity and a slight decrease in anterior contact intensity. Conversely, the Essix group had increased anterior contact intensity and decreased posterior contact intensity. These changes were not statistically significant (P=0.17). The Occless Essix group had an increased number of posterior occlusal contacts and a decreased number of anterior contacts, while the Essix group showed a slight increase in anterior contacts. These changes were not statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion:
There were no significant differences between Essix and Occless Essix retainers regarding changes in occlusal force intensities or the number of occlusal contacts after three months.
