Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Predictors of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure across commonly used cuff widths
Isaac J Wedig1,2,3, Isaac M Lennox2,3, Erich J Petushek3,4
1School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI, United States.
None:
We compared predictors of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) across commonly used blood flow restriction (BFR) cuff widths (11, 13, 18 cm) and developed prediction equations to estimate AOP for each cuff. Participants (n = 116) underwent measurements of thigh circumference (TC), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and AOP was assessed using Doppler ultrasound in a seated position. Multiple linear regression models with commonality analysis and mixed-effects models were used to identify and compare predictors of AOP between each cuff. LASSO regression with bootstrap resampling was used to develop and internally validate prediction equations. TC, SBP, DBP, age, and sex explained 60%-70% of total variance in AOP, with greater predictive power in narrower cuffs. As cuff width increased, TC uniquely accounted for less (36%, 26%, 11% for 11, 13, 18 cm, respectively) and SBP uniquely accounted for more (2%, 6%, 12% for 11, 13, 18 cm, respectively) variance. A cuff width × TC interaction indicated that limb size had greater influence on AOP with narrower cuffs. In contrast, the relationship between SBP and AOP remained stable across cuff widths. Prediction equations demonstrated good predictability and calibration, with limits of agreement ranging from ±18.4 to ±28.6 mmHg and statistical equivalence between predicted and measured AOP. Internal validation showed minimal overfitting. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for cuff width in BFR pressure prescription, with narrower cuffs requiring consideration primarily of TC, and wider cuffs requiring consideration of both TC and SBP. These cuff-specific equations may offer a practical alternative to direct AOP measurement.
More Related Videos
04:44Author Spotlight: Enhancing Vascular Function and Physical Capacity in Cardiovascular Disease Through Novel Interventions and NIRS Technology
Published on: March 22, 2024
08:39Fabrication of Compressed Hosiery and Measurement of its Pressure Characteristic Exerted on the Lower Limbs
Published on: May 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation