Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Risk of Urinary Tract Infection with Perineal Urethrostomy Versus Urethroplasty
Yishai H Rappaport1,2, Nir Rahav1, Boris Chertin3
1Center for Reconstructive and Functional Urology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hadassah School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Perineal urethrostomy (PU) does not increase urinary tract infection (UTI) risk compared to urethroplasty for complex urethral strictures. This study found similar UTI rates between PU and urethroplasty, offering valuable insights for treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Innovation
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a treatment for complex urethral strictures, particularly after failed urethroplasty.
- The anatomical location of the neourethral meatus after PU may theoretically increase urinary tract infection (UTI) risk.
- This study aimed to evaluate and compare UTI rates in patients undergoing PU versus urethroplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients who have undergone perineal urethrostomy (PU).
- To compare UTI rates between patients treated with PU and those treated with substitution or augmented urethroplasty for complex urethral strictures.
- To determine if PU poses a higher risk for recurrent UTIs (rUTIs) compared to urethroplasty.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of medical records for patients who underwent PU between 2004 and 2023.
- Comparison with a control group of patients with similar complex urethral strictures treated with urethroplasty.
- Primary endpoint: incidence of recurrent UTI (rUTI) or prophylactic UTI treatment; secondary data: chronic asymptomatic bacteriuria, UTI events, urethral dilation; statistical analysis using t tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Fisher's exact test.
Main Results:
- The study included 67 patients in the PU group and 66 in the control urethroplasty group.
- Recurrent UTI (rUTI) incidence was 21% in both the PU and urethroplasty groups.
- No significant differences were observed in rUTI rates (21% vs. 21%), urethral dilation requirements (p=0.78), asymptomatic bacteriuria (p=0.74), or antibiotic-treated UTI events (p=0.71) between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Perineal urethrostomy (PU) does not appear to increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) when compared to urethroplasty for complex urethral strictures.
- The findings suggest that PU is a viable surgical option for complex urethral strictures without a significantly higher risk of UTIs.
- These results provide important clinical guidance for surgeons managing patients with complex urethral strictures, informing treatment choice based on infection risk.
More Related Videos
03:25Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
06:39Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Published on: November 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management