Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Application Effect of Different Robotic Surgery Systems in Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Study Based on a
Jian-Wei Yang1,2, Li Wang1,2, Si-Yu Chen1,2
1Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) shows comparable safety across four systems. Da Vinci offers efficiency, while KangDuo may improve recovery, guiding personalized robotic surgery choices.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Technology
- Oncology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PCa) presents significant global health challenges with increasing incidence and mortality.
- Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) is a preferred minimally invasive surgical approach for PCa.
- Evaluating different robotic surgical systems is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing four robotic surgical systems: Da Vinci (DV), KangDuo (KD), Hugo (HG), and Hinotori.
- To assess the clinical performance of these systems in RP for PCa.
- To provide evidence-based insights for selecting robotic systems based on clinical priorities.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and NMA following PRISMA guidelines, including studies up to January 2025.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the four robotic systems in RP for PCa.
- Analysis of outcomes including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications, urinary incontinence, and surgical margins.
Main Results:
- Data from 2064 patients across 15 studies were analyzed.
- Da Vinci (DV) demonstrated the shortest operative time (SUCRA: 90.7).
- No significant differences were observed in blood loss, hospital stay, or complication rates, though KD showed a slight advantage in hospital stay (SUCRA: 85.8) and HG had the lowest complication rate (SUCRA: 84.3).
- Positive surgical margins and 3-month urinary incontinence rates were comparable across all systems.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated robotic systems offer comparable safety profiles for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients.
- Da Vinci excels in operative efficiency, while KangDuo shows potential benefits in postoperative recovery and blood loss control.
- System selection can be tailored to specific clinical priorities, with ongoing research needed for personalized treatment strategies.
More Related Videos
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025