Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
Usefulness of the Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Diagnostic Tools SAMANTA Questionnaire and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding-Visual
Josep Perelló-Capó1,2, Josep Estadella-Tarriel1,2, Ignasi Gich-Saladich3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
The SAMANTA questionnaire and the Heavy Menstrual Bleeding-Visual Analog Scale (HMB-VAS) tool have been validated for diagnosing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). We assessed their value for screening iron deficiency (ID).
Material And Methods:
Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized, phase 4 Cooper and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (IUD) Barcelona Research Iniciative (COLIBRI) study, which assessed the bleeding profile of two intrauterine devices. We used information collected during the last follow-up visit (month 36): sociodemographics, hemoglobin/ferritin levels, SAMANTA questionnaire, HMB-VAS tool, and EuroQoL five-dimension five-level scores. The primary outcome was the accuracy of these diagnostic tools in identifying ID. We also assessed their relationship with EQ-5D-5L.
Results:
We analyzed information from 57 women, 18 (31.6%) and 14 (24.6%) with HMB according to the SAMANTA questionnaire and the HMB-VAS tool, respectively. Ferritin levels showed better inverse correlation than hemoglobin with these HMB diagnostic tools' scores: r = -0.539 and r = -0.557, respectively, both p < 0.001. In women with HMB according to these tools, the ferritin threshold showing the best sensitivity and specificity to identify ID was <10 ng/mL with the SAMANTA questionnaire (71.4% [Confidence Interval (CI) 95% 35.2-93.5] and 78% [CI 95% 65.2-87.7], respectively) and <15 ng/mL for the HMB-VAS tool (58.3% [CI 95% 31.2-87.7] and 82.2% [CI 95% 69.2-91.2], respectively). Only the EQ-VAS scores correlated inversely with the scores of both HMB diagnostic tools (r = -0.308, p = 0.02, and r = -0.294, p = 0.026, respectively).
Conclusions:
This exploratory analysis shows the SAMANTA questionnaire's good potential for ID screening. The scores of both HMB diagnostic tools correlated with the EQ-VAS, demonstrating their value in capturing the HMB impact on quality of life.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

