Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Efficacy and safety of microaxial flow pump in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis
Rafia Hussain1, Saira Bano2,3, Hanzalah Bin Arshad4
1Fatima Jinnah Medical University Lahore, Pakistan.
Introduction:
Data regarding mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock are limited.
Methods:
PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 16 June 2024. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random effects model.
Results:
Four RCTs were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of all-cause death in patients with the use of a microaxial flow pump at 6-month follow-up (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.97) and cardiac death (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94) as compared to the control group. However, the use of a microaxial flow pump was associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (RR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.21 to 4.24), limb ischemia (RR = 4.46; 95% CI: 1.31 to 15.16), and sepsis (RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.67). The risk of stroke and rehospitalizations remained comparable across the two groups.
Conclusions:
The use of a microaxial flow pump in infarct-related cardiogenic shock can reduce mortality at the expense of increased risk of bleeding, limb ischemia, and sepsis. Further research is required to validate our findings.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

