Characterizing dynamic functional connectivity subnetwork contributions in narrative classification with Shapley
Aurora Rossi1, Yanis Aeschlimann2, Emanuele Natale1
1COATI, Université Côte d'Azur, INRIA, CNRS, I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Network Neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
|October 27, 2025
Summary
This study uses machine learning to analyze brain networks during narrative tasks, revealing that understanding content involves both top-down and bottom-up processes, particularly from the temporal parietal subnetwork.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Machine Learning Applications in Brain Imaging
Background:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is crucial for studying brain activity.
- Dynamic functional connectivity analysis models temporal brain networks.
- Understanding narrative comprehension requires exploring brain network dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model dynamic functional connectivity during narrative tasks as temporal brain networks.
- To classify narrative modality and content using a supervised machine learning model.
- To investigate subnetwork contributions to narrative comprehension using Shapley values.
Main Methods:
- Modeled dynamic functional connectivity from fMRI data during narrative tasks.
- Employed a supervised machine learning model for classification of narrative features.
- Utilized Shapley values to analyze subnetwork contributions within Yeo parcellations.
Main Results:
- Successfully classified narrative modality and content using the machine learning model.
- Identified specific subnetwork contributions to understanding narrative modality and content.
- Demonstrated the involvement of the temporal parietal subnetwork in narrative comprehension.
Conclusions:
- The study provides novel insights into the functional aspects of the brain during narrative tasks.
- Narrative schematic representations may emerge from bottom-up processing driven by the temporal parietal subnetwork.
- Findings challenge the notion that narrative comprehension relies solely on top-down processes and pre-existing knowledge.
Related Concept Videos
Trait Centrality
171
Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a...
171
Classification of Neurotransmitters
5.0K
Neurotransmitters play a crucial role in the communication between neurons in the autonomic nervous system. Neurons in the autonomic nervous system can be cholinergic or adrenergic depending on the neurotransmitters synthesized. Cholinergic neurons use acetylcholine as their primary neurotransmitter. This includes all the preganglionic fibers of the sympathetic and pre- and postganglionic fibers of the parasympathetic nervous systems. In addition, neurons of the somatic nervous system also use...
5.0K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
433
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
433
Relationship Formation
45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Functional Classification of Joints
6.5K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
6.5K
Aggregates Classification
963
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
963


