Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Contrast increment and decrement processing measured using visual search in established glaucoma
Vanessa Thien Sze Tang1,2, Andrew Turpin2,3, William Huxley Morgan2,4
1Department of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Introduction:
Visual processing of contrast increments and decrements begins with ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells (RGC) through ON and OFF pathways that signal light and dark information, respectively. In experimental glaucoma, OFF RGC are selectively vulnerable, relative to ON RGC. This study tested whether the rate of performance associated with advancing visual field severity differed between ON and OFF pathways in a cross-sectional group of people with established glaucoma.
Methods:
A total of 106 participants (mean age: 67, range: 33-84 years old) with established glaucoma performed a visual search task as part of a longitudinal prospective clinical study (Individualised Perimetry Progression Observations in Glaucoma Study). Participants responded quickly and accurately to high contrast larger white or black squares superimposed within a pixelated black and white background displayed on an iPad tablet. Final increment and decrement response times were calculated from 90 stimuli per contrast fitted to an exponential-Gaussian curve. In addition, 24-2 visual fields were measured (Compass perimeter, ZEST-Fast strategy).
Results:
Slower response times were observed with greater visual field loss. Cross-sectionally, there were similar rates of decline for ON and OFF response times as a function of visual field mean deviation (bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals of the regression slopes: increments [-0.21, -0.06]; decrements [-0.12, -0.04]). Individuals with central-sparing perimetric defects were faster at searching for both increment and decrement stimuli relative to individuals with central-involving loss (ON: 3.52 s vs. 2.82 s, p < 0.001; OFF: 2.54 s vs. 1.95 s, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
This study does not support selective OFF RGC loss in glaucoma. People with more advanced glaucoma and central visual field loss had markedly slower response times than those with early glaucoma, with equivalent performance reduction for ON and OFF probing stimuli.
Clinical Trial Registration:
This data is collected as part of a registered clinical study: Individualised Perimetry Progression Observations in Glaucoma Study (ACTRN12623000961640).
More Related Videos
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024
05:10Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
Published on: March 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment