Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
Published on: November 22, 2016
Cerchar abrasiveness index prediction based on rock properties leveraging hybrid soft computing techniques
Mohammad Matin Rouhani1, Alireza Dolatshahi2, Mahdi Hasanipanah3,4
1Department of Mining Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran. matrouhani1999@gmail.com.
Abstract:
The Cerchar Abrasiveness Index (CAI) is a vital parameter in geotechnical engineering, especially when it comes to tunneling and mechanized excavations. The study employed a comprehensive dataset of 163 samples representing various rock types, including igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic formations. The methodology included three base algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest), improved by three distinct metaheuristic techniques: Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA), Reptile Search Optimization (RSO), and Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO). The Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), equivalent quartz content (EQC), and brittleness index (BI) were the four main rock parameters used to make the predictive models. The model was further evaluated by splitting the data into 80% training and 20% testing sets. Subsequently, the model was compared to 17 real-world hard rock TBM projects in different countries and geological conditions. The AOA-optimized versions performed nicely, with AOA-LightGBM doing the best on the held-out test set (R² = 0.952, RMSE = 0.290, MAE = 0.208, VAF = 0.952). External validation showed that AOA-XGBoost performed properly, with the highest correlation coefficient of 0.8308 compared to field measurements from international tunneling projects. Also, the AOA-XGBoost did well on tests with R² = 0.951, RMSE = 0.296, MAE = 0.223, and VAF = 0.951. Using SHAP values to examine feature importance revealed unique parameter influence signatures. EQC was the most important parameter in XGBoost models, while UCS had the greatest impact in LightGBM and Random Forest-based models. The new method described here is an important advancement in CAI prediction methodology. It is more accurate and efficient than traditional experimental testing methods, and it works well on different types of rock. Its engineering applicability has been proven through real-world operational scenarios.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...

