Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Development and evaluation of a risk calculator for fracture-related infection after open reduction and internal
Chin-Yi Liao1,2, Yu-Der Lu1, Yu-Jui Chang1,3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Ta Pei Road, Niao Sung Dist, Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan.
Background:
Fracture-related infection (FRI) and subsequent persistent infections significantly affect fracture surgeries. We aimed to develop a precise, personalized risk calculator to assist orthopedic surgeons in evaluating perioperative FRI risk.
Methods:
Data from 36,087 patients across two medical centers and four regional hospitals were analyzed. We assessed 29 risk factors, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, fracture location, and surgical variables using multivariable logistic regression. Each factor was weighted based on its regression coefficient. Discrimination and calibration were assessed with optimism-corrected AUC and Brier scores (1 000-fold bootstrap) and calibration plots.
Results:
FRI occurred in 2396 patients (6.64%), and 453 patients (1.26%) experienced persistent infections. The top 10 risk factors included male sex, open fractures, tibiofibular fractures, ankle/foot fractures, operative time, hospital stay, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and psychotic disorders. Optimism-corrected AUCs for predicting FRI and persistent infections were 0.781 [p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.772-0.791] and 0.801 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.779-0.823), respectively. Optimal cutoff scores for predicting FRI and persistent infections were 213 (sensitivity 0.638, specificity 0.796) and 232 (sensitivity 0.658, specificity 0.821). Calibration plots demonstrated good predictive performance (mean absolute errors: FRI 0.006, persistent infection 0.006). Brier scores were 0.055 (FRI) and 0.012 (persistent infections), indicating good accuracy.
Conclusions:
The FRI risk calculator showed good predictive abilities, with optimized cutoff points aiding perioperative planning and preventive measures. Patient engagement in understanding of infection risk can improve treatment outcomes. Limitations include participant biases and retrospective design; prospective external validation is recommended.
More Related Videos
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
09:34A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:26Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...