Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.9K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.9K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

3.4K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.9K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

11.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
11.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

545
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
545

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MonotonicityTest: An R Package for Efficient Nonparametric Monotonicity Testing.

Observational studies·2026
Same author

Differences in Telemedicine Use Between Rural and Urban Medicare Beneficiaries With Kidney Failure.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Socioeconomic status and acculturation as determinants of atopic disease prevalence in United States Latino children.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2026
Same author

Assessing surrogate heterogeneity in real world data using meta-learners.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Model-Free Approach to Evaluate a Censored Intermediate Outcome as a Surrogate for Overall Survival.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

RISE: Two-Stage Rank-Based Identification of High-Dimensional Surrogate Markers Applied to Vaccinology.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.7K

Efficient Testing Using Surrogate Information.

Rebecca Knowlton1, Layla Parast1

  • 1Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|October 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new nonparametric method for clinical trials to efficiently use surrogate markers when their validity varies across patient groups. This approach improves treatment effect estimation and hypothesis testing, even when primary outcomes are not measured for all participants.

Keywords:
clinical trialheterogeneitystudy designsurrogate markerstreatment effect

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K
Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
08:16

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Published on: May 9, 2016

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K
Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
08:16

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Published on: May 9, 2016

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Clinical trials face pressure to use surrogate markers due to cost and time constraints of primary outcomes.
  • Existing methods for surrogate marker analysis often rely on strict parametric assumptions or assume universal surrogate validity.
  • Heterogeneity in surrogate marker utility across patient subgroups presents a challenge for traditional analytical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a fully nonparametric method for efficient testing using surrogate information (ETSI).
  • To address settings with heterogeneity in surrogate marker utility, where surrogates are valid only for specific patient subgroups.
  • To enable robust treatment effect estimation and hypothesis testing in complex clinical trial scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a fully nonparametric approach named Efficient Testing using Surrogate Information (ETSI).
  • Employed kernel-based estimation for treatment effect estimation and hypothesis testing.
  • Designed the method for scenarios where surrogate markers are used for valid subgroups and primary outcomes are measured in remaining patients.

Main Results:

  • ETSI allows for efficient hypothesis testing and treatment effect estimation in the presence of heterogeneous surrogate marker utility.
  • The method accommodates situations where the primary outcome is not measured for all participants.
  • Simulation studies and application to HIV clinical trials demonstrate the method's performance.

Conclusions:

  • The ETSI method provides a flexible and robust framework for utilizing surrogate markers in clinical trials with heterogeneous surrogate validity.
  • This approach can lead to more timely and cost-effective decision-making regarding treatment effectiveness.
  • The study offers a framework for future clinical trial design, including power and sample size estimations.