Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Correlation Between Oral Health Status and Oral Health Impact Profile in Children With Special Needs: A
Sakshi Aggarwal1, Mansi Atri1, Nithya S2
1Public Health Dentistry, ESIC Dental College and Hospital Rohini, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Aim:
The study aims to correlate the oral health status and oral health impact profile (OHIP) of children with special needs.
Objectives:
The study's objectives are to assess and compare the oral health status and OHIP of children with special needs using the Oral Health Impact Profile - 14 items (OHIP-14) questionnaire and through clinical examination.
Material And Methods:
One hundred thirty-five children with special needs under 13 years of age attending a special school in Dwarka, New Delhi, India, were included in the study. They were surveyed with the help of a questionnaire and clinical examination. In addition to sociodemographic factors, the children were assessed for the type of disability. Their oral hygiene was assessed using questions on frequency of brushing, other dental aids, and the reason for dental visits. The oral health impact profile was assessed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire, and the total score was obtained by adding the individual scores of seven domains. Oral health was examined using the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index, the gingival index, and the plaque index. The total DMFT score was calculated by adding the scores of each tooth. Oral hygiene was recorded as excellent, good, fair, or poor as per plaque index scores. Gingival disease was recorded as mild, moderate, or severe as per the gingival index scores. OHIP scores were correlated with DMFT scores, gingival index, and plaque index scores to assess the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of these children.
Results:
A total of 135 subjects studying in a special school in Dwarka were studied. Out of the total subjects, 104 (77%) were male and 31 (23%) female. The majority of the study population (113, 83.7%) were in the age group of 10-13 years, 17 (12.6%) were in seven to nine years, and five (3.7%) were in four to six years. Regarding basic oral hygiene, the majority (72.6%) of children (98) could do household chores on their own, 104 (77%) brushed only once, and 74 (54.8%) used mouthwash in addition to brushing. Out of all children, 106 (78.5%) had never visited a dentist. The study population included 69 (51.1%) autistic children. The mean OHIP score was 5.05 ± 6.28, and the mean DMFT score was 2.96 ± 2.29. On correlating OHIP scores with indices, statistical significance was seen in correlating DMFT with functional limitation score (p = 0.048), DMFT with handicap score (p = 0.219), and gingival score with handicap score (p = 0.230).
Conclusion:
The study reveals that children with special needs have poor oral hygiene with increased risk of caries and gingival disease. However, there is no impact on their quality of life. The main reason is the acceptance of poor oral hygiene by both the children and their caregivers. Thus, the need of the hour is to sensitize the caregivers and parents of these children regarding the importance of oral health through various oral health programs.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Oral
Weaning, typically occurring...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

