Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
Impact of Modified Brain Injury Guideline Incorporating Neurosurgical Consultation on Resource Utilization and
Ramesh Grandhi1, Diwas Gautam2, Monica-Rae Owens2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA.
Background And Objectives:
Based on recent guidelines, neurosurgeons are no longer routinely consulted for certain patients with acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The brain injury guidelines (BIG) standardize care and optimize resource utilization but lack protocolized neurosurgical involvement for patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because of constraints on hospital bed availability in the post-COVID era, University of Utah Health adopted a modified BIG (UteBIG) protocol that included neurosurgical consultation for all patients with complicated mTBI. We evaluated resource utilization and follow-up care before and after implementation.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with mTBI presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage before (January 2016-August 2022) and after (September 2022-December 2023) implementation of UteBIG. We compared emergency department (ED) discharge rates, hospital length of stay, and follow-up care.
Results:
In total, 977 patients (63.5% male, mean age 58.02 ± 20.1 years) with mTBI were analyzed. The most common (57.6%) Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15. After implementation of UteBIG, significantly more patients were discharged directly from the ED (0.3% vs 7.2%, P < .001) and discharged home posthospitalization (45.6% vs 69.2%, P < .001). Length of stay did not differ significantly (8.33 days vs 5.17 days, P = .27). Follow-up care, including receipt of TBI-related educational material (78.5% vs 83.9%, P = .06) and 3-month follow-up rate (67.4% vs 72.7%, P = .13), was not significantly different before and after implementation; however, significantly fewer patients returned to the ED with lesion expansion after implementation (6.0% vs 2.7%, P = .02).
Conclusion:
Implementation of a resource utilization-focused protocol at our trauma center incorporating neurosurgery consultation for patients with complicated mTBI led to higher rates of direct discharges from the ED and to home without compromising TBI-related follow-up care. Results demonstrate that adoption of a modified BIG protocol that includes neurosurgical collaboration can translate to more efficient patient care, while ensuring stewardship of post-TBI follow-up care.
More Related Videos
04:54Modified Mouse Model of Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Incorporating Thinned-Skull Window and Fluid Percussion
Published on: April 19, 2024
08:27Development of an Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Model Modified by Weight-Drop Method and Evidenced by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 11, 2025