Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Measurement of Unsteady Surface Pressure Using a Remote Microphone Probe
Published on: December 3, 2016
Time Delay and Frequency Analysis of Remote Microphones.
Elena Andreatta1, Igor Caregnato1, Antonio Selmo2
1Acustica Caregnato, Marostica, 36063 Vicenza, Italy.
Latency in classroom audio systems varies significantly between remote microphones (RMs) and hearing aids (HAs), impacting speech-to-text captioning. Understanding these delays is crucial for developing effective temporal coupling solutions for students with hearing impairments.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Acoustics
- Assistive Listening Devices
Background:
- Classroom speech-to-text systems like A.BA.CO. use remote microphones (RMs) to reduce background noise.
- Signal latency differences between RMs and personal hearing devices (hearing aids [HAs] and cochlear implants [CIs]) pose challenges for users.
- Temporal coupling solutions are needed to synchronize audio streams for improved accessibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish foundational data for a temporal coupling solution by measuring latency in RMs compatible with HAs and CIs.
- To analyze the frequency response of RM and HA systems, both independently and when combined.
- To assess the electroacoustic performance of RMs and HAs under varying conditions.
Main Methods:
- Electroacoustic measurements were conducted in a specialized laboratory.
- Two Behind-The-Ear HAs and two RMs were tested.
- The comparison method was used to assess performance with different compression ratios.
Main Results:
- RMs exhibited latency differences of 10-12 ms (23-35 ms range).
- HAs showed time delays differing by 1-2 ms (5-7 ms range).
- Combined RM and HA use with similar gains resulted in comb-filter distortions, affecting acoustic output.
Conclusions:
- Communication systems must account for brand- and model-specific RM delays.
- RMs are most effective when they are the primary sound source for the eardrum.
- The effectiveness of A.BA.CO. with RMs depends on these latency and acoustic interaction factors.
More Related Videos
07:14Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
06:01Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Properties of Fourier Transform I
In radio broadcasting, multiple audio signals often need to be transmitted simultaneously. The Fourier...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Properties of DTFT I
The linearity property of DTFTs is fundamental. If two discrete-time signals are multiplied by constants a and b respectively, and then combined to...
Mesh Analysis for AC Circuits
The process of harmonizing these impedances begins with a clear understanding of the input and output signals. Once these signals are known, the...