Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

11:18
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
Published on: March 2, 2015
10.8K
A Review of Uncertainty Representation and Quantification in Neural Networks
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
|October 28, 2025
Summary
Estimating uncertainty in neural networks is crucial for reliable AI. This review explores methods to quantify aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, enhancing model trustworthiness.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Uncertainty Quantification
Background:
- Neural networks require robust uncertainty estimation for dependable predictions.
- Distinguishing between aleatoric (data) and epistemic (model) uncertainty is key.
- Current methods for uncertainty quantification in deep learning are diverse.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of methodologies for uncertainty representation and quantification in neural networks.
- To differentiate between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty within neural network models.
- To analyze the strengths and limitations of various uncertainty estimation techniques.
Main Methods:
- Review of classical probabilistic techniques: Bayesian neural networks and deep ensembles.
- Exploration of generalized probability methods: Dirichlet distributions, belief functions, random sets, probability intervals, and credal sets.
- Examination of interval-based approaches using interval models.
Main Results:
- Categorization of diverse uncertainty quantification methodologies.
- Analysis of the applicability and constraints of each approach.
- Identification of research gaps and future directions in the field.
Conclusions:
- Effective uncertainty estimation is vital for trustworthy AI systems.
- A variety of methods exist, each with unique advantages and disadvantages.
- Further research is needed to advance robust uncertainty quantification in neural networks.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
1.5K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
10.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.1K
Neural Regulation
43.1K
Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.
43.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
99.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
99.6K