Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Tolerance of Cabbage Butterflies to Urban Pollutants
Published on: August 18, 2023
Heavy Metal Pollution and Health-Ecological Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soils: A Case Study from the Yellow River
Zang Liu1,2, Li Mo1,2, Jiahui Liang2
1Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Abstract:
Agricultural soils near industrial parks in the Yellow River bend region face severe heavy metal pollution, posing a significant to human health. This study integrated field sampling with laboratory analysis and applied geostatistical analysis, positive matrix factorization (PMF) modeling, and health risk assessment models to systematically investigate the pollution levels, spatial distribution, sources, and ecological health risks of heavy metals in the area. The main findings are as follows: (1) The average concentrations of the eight heavy metals (Hg, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Cd, and Ni) in the study area were 0.04, 48.3, 54.3, 45.7, 70.0, 22.9, 0.4, and 35.7 mg·kg-1, respectively. The concentrations exceeded local background values by factors ranging from 1.32 to 11.2. Exceedances of soil screening and control values were particularly pronounced for Cd and As. Based on the geoaccumulation index, over 75% of the sampling sites for Cr, Pb, Zn, and Cd were classified as moderately to heavily polluted. Potential ecological risk assessment highlighted Cd as the significant ecological risk factor, indicating considerable heavy metal pollution in the region. (2) Kriging interpolation demonstrated elevated concentrations in the western (mid-upper) and eastern (mid-lower) subregions. Pearson correlation analysis suggested common sources for Cu-Pb-As-Cd and Cr-Zn-Ni. (3) PMF source apportionment identified four primary sources: traffic emissions (38.19%), natural and agricultural mixed sources (34.55%), metal smelting (17.61%), and atmospheric deposition (10.10%). (4) Health risk assessment indicated that the non-carcinogenic risk for both adults and children was within acceptable limits (adults: 0.065; children: 0.12). Carcinogenic risks were also acceptable (adults: 5.67 × 10-5; children: 6.70 × 10-5). In conclusion, priority should be given to the control of traffic emissions and agriculturally derived sources in the management of soil heavy metal contamination in this region, while the considerable contribution of smelting activities warrants heightened attention. This study provides a scientific basis for the prevention, control, and targeted remediation of regional soil heavy metal pollution.
More Related Videos
09:51TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples
Published on: September 19, 2025
05:52Resource Recycling of Red Soil to Synthesize Fe2O3/FAU-type Zeolite Composite Material for Heavy Metal Removal
Published on: June 2, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms