Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Long-term Video Tracking of Cohoused Aquatic Animals: A Case Study of the Daily Locomotor Activity of the Norway Lobster Nephrops norvegicus
Published on: April 8, 2019
DAEF-YOLO Model for Individual and Behavior Recognition of Sanhua Geese in Precision Farming Applications
Tianyuan Sun1,2, Shujuan Zhang1,2, Rui Ren1,2
1College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu District, Jinzhong 030801, China.
None:
The rapid expansion of the goose farming industry creates a growing need for real-time flock counting and individual-level behavior monitoring. To meet this challenge, this study proposes an improved YOLOv8-based model, termed DAEF-YOLO (DualConv-augmented C2f, ADown down-sampling, Efficient Channel Attention integrated into SPPF, and FocalerIoU regression loss), designed for simultaneous recognition of Sanhua goose individuals and their diverse behaviors. The model incorporates three targeted architectural improvements: (1) a C2f-Dual module that enhances multi-scale feature extraction and fusion, (2) ECA embedded in the SPPF module to refine channel interaction with minimal parameter cost and (3) an ADown down-sampling module that preserves cross-channel information continuity while reducing information loss. Additionally, the adoption of the FocalerIoU loss function enhances bounding-box regression accuracy in complex detection scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that DAEF-YOLO surpasses YOLOv5s, YOLOv7-Tiny, YOLOv7, YOLOv9s, and YOLOv10s in both accuracy and computational efficiency. Compared with YOLOv8s, DAEF-YOLO achieved a 4.56% increase in precision, 6.37% in recall, 5.50% in F1-score, and 4.59% in mAP@0.5, reaching 94.65%, 92.17%, 93.39%, and 96.10%, respectively. A generalizable classification strategy is further introduced by adding a complementary "Other" category to include behaviors beyond predefined classes. This approach ensures complete recognition coverage and demonstrates strong transferability for multi-task detection across species and environments. Ablation studies indicated that mAP@0.5 remained consistent (~96.1%), while mAP@0.5:0.95 improved in the absence of the "Other" class (75.68% vs. 69.82%). Despite this trade-off, incorporating the "Other" category ensures annotation completeness and more robust multi-task behavior recognition under real-world variability.
Related Concept Videos
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Field Application of Global Positioning System
