Driving Performance in Schizophrenia: The Role of Neurocognitive Correlates-A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Schizophrenia is associated with cognitive deficits that may compromise everyday functioning, including driving. This review systematically examined recent original research (2015-2025) on driving performance in individuals with schizophrenia with a focus on neuropsychological factors, applying a narrative synthesis given the heterogeneity of designs and outcomes, while no quantitative meta-analysis was feasible. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a structured search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted on 4 May 2025. The inclusion criteria were original studies involving individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, published between 2015 and 2025. Studies on animals, other psychiatric or neurological conditions, and healthy populations were also excluded. Critical appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Extracted data included sample demographics, cognitive deficits, neuropsychological assessments, brain imaging, and the main findings. A narrative synthesis was then performed. Results: Six high-quality studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were grouped into three categories: (1) driving behavior: fitness to drive varied widely across individuals, (2) cognitive deficits and brain activity: poorer driving-related performance was consistently associated with specific impairments in cognition and brain structure, and (3) medication effects: individuals taking certain atypical antipsychotics demonstrated better driving performance compared to those on other types of medication, while extrapyramidal symptoms negatively influenced driving fitness. Conclusions: Driving in schizophrenia is shaped by cognitive, clinical, and pharmacological factors. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of individualized evaluations, integration into personalized care and targeted rehabilitation to promote driving autonomy and community inclusion. This area remains under-researched, as only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which restricts the robustness and generalizability of the conclusions. Funding: This review received no funding from any external sources. Registration: The review protocol was submitted to PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD420251060580.