Evidence-Based Classification, Assessment, and Management of Pain in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Structured

Anna Gogola1,2, Rafał Gnat1,2

  • 1Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.

PubMed

Insights

Pain in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is complex, requiring a biopsychosocial approach. Individualized, multimodal strategies integrating physical therapies and supports are recommended, but clinical implementation faces challenges due to limited evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pain Management
  • Cerebral Palsy Research
  • Biopsychosocial Health

Background:

  • Pain is a significant, often overlooked issue in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
  • Untreated pain can lead to reduced mobility, mental health issues, and decreased quality of life.
  • Understanding pain mechanisms, contributing factors, and diagnostic challenges in CP is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the complex mechanisms of pain in CP.
  • To highlight factors contributing to pain in this population.
  • To emphasize diagnostic challenges and multimodal pain management strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Searched three databases and guideline repositories (2015-2025).
  • Included 49 studies (reviews, guidelines, limited RCTs) after initial screening of 1335 records.
  • Assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR-2 and Oxford levels of evidence.

Main Results:

  • Identified overlapping nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain mechanisms.
  • Found inconsistent pain classification and limited validated assessment tools (only five).
  • Interventions primarily involved pharmacological (27%) and physiotherapeutic (23%) approaches, with substantial evidence gaps.

Conclusions:

  • Pain in children and adolescents with CP is complex, necessitating a biopsychosocial approach.
  • Individualized, multimodal strategies combining physical therapies, contextual supports, and medical/surgical interventions are supported.
  • Clinical implementation is hindered by limited high-quality evidence, inadequate assessment tools, and poor interdisciplinary integration.